House v. NCAA Settlement Framework — Updated Q1 2026

What Is Your Revenue Share Market Value?

Get a position-specific, school-tier-adjusted estimate of your revenue share allocation under the House v. NCAA settlement — including Tier 1 through Mid-Major comparisons.

Start Free Assessment ↓
Data from:
House v. NCAA Settlement Docs (2025) On3 NIL Database ESPN Investigative Reporting Power 4 Dept. Disclosures
Step 1 of 6 Getting Started
Are you an athlete or a sports representative?
I'm an Athlete
See your market value and school-tier comparison
Agent / Coach / Recruiter
Get the full negotiation intelligence report
Please select an option to continue.
About You
Please select your current status.
Select your sport.
Football
Men's Basketball
Women's Basketball
Baseball
Men's Soccer
Women's Soccer
Other Sport
Please select your sport to continue.
Select your position.
Please select your position to continue.
Select your school tier (current or target).
Tier 1 Power 4
Alabama, Georgia, Ohio State, Michigan, Texas, LSU, Notre Dame, Clemson, Penn State, USC, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Oregon, Florida, Miami
Tier 2 Power 4
Remaining SEC, Big Ten, Big 12, and ACC programs — spending $12M–$18M annually
Tier 3 Power 4
Lower-revenue Power 4 programs — spending $6M–$12M annually
Mid-Major D1
American Athletic, Mountain West, Sun Belt, MAC, C-USA, etc. — $1M–$5M annually
D2 / D3 / NAIA
Minimal or no formal revenue share structure
Please select your school tier to continue.
What is the athlete's recruiting ranking?
5-Star
Top 25 nationally / elite prospect
4-Star
Top 300 nationally / high-level recruit
3-Star
Ranked prospect / solid recruit
2-Star / Unrated
Walk-on / unranked / transfer
Have your 247Sports profile open while completing this form for the most accurate evaluation. Paste your profile URL here and it will be included in your evaluation report.
Please select a recruiting ranking to continue.
NIL Brand Presence
Combined social media following across all platforms.
500K+ followers
Significant influencer presence
100K – 500K
Strong regional/national presence
10K – 100K
Growing presence
Under 10K / None
Minimal or early-stage brand
Does the athlete have existing brand deal income?
Yes — active brand deals
No existing deals
Please answer both questions above.
— / 100
Revenue Share Estimate by School Tier
These figures reflect reported and estimated revenue share allocations based on position, school tier, and recruiting profile under the House v. NCAA settlement framework. Individual allocations vary based on program-specific budgets and negotiation outcomes.
For agents and recruiters reviewing your profile: share your 247Sports URL when submitting your evaluation to include your verified recruiting history in the full agent report.

Want to understand how to negotiate your maximum value? Talk to a sports representative who knows this landscape.

Book a Consultation
Track & Compare Your Evaluations

Track Your Value Over Time

Save this evaluation so you can return later, run a new assessment, and see how your market value has changed.

Returning? Load Your Previous Evaluation

Enter your email to reload your saved profile and run a side-by-side comparison with your current results.

Compare Your Offers

Add offers you've received to compare total value side-by-side.

Not legal or financial advice. Revenue share estimates are based on publicly available data and modeling. Actual allocations depend on individual negotiations, program budgets, and NCAA compliance requirements. Consult a qualified sports attorney or certified agent before entering into any agreement.
— / 100
Revenue Share Overview by School Tier
Negotiation Intelligence
Position Market Data
Sources: House v. NCAA Settlement Documentation (2025), On3 NIL Valuation Database, ESPN Investigative Reporting, Power 4 Athletic Department Disclosures. Ranges reflect publicly reported and modeled allocation data and are updated quarterly.
Track & Compare Athlete Evaluations

Save This Athlete's Evaluation

Save this report by client email to run a comparative analysis on future evaluations and track value changes over time.

Load a Previous Evaluation

Load a previously saved athlete profile to compare their current market value against a prior evaluation.

Offer Comparison Analysis

Add all offers on the table to generate a side-by-side analysis with negotiation anchoring notes.

Download the Full PDF Report — $9.99

Get a formatted PDF containing this complete negotiation intelligence report, all tier comparisons, and offer analysis — formatted for client presentation.

Download PDF — $9.99
Not legal or financial advice. Revenue share estimates are based on publicly available data and modeling. Actual allocations depend on individual negotiations, program budgets, and NCAA compliance requirements. Consult a qualified sports attorney or certified agent before entering into any agreement.
How We Build These Estimates

Data Sources & Methodology

Every estimate is built from cross-referenced public data — not guesswork.

House v. NCAA Settlement

The $20.5M annual per-school revenue share cap established by the 2025 settlement forms the foundation for all Tier 1 allocation estimates. Tier breakdowns are modeled from reported program budgets and public filings.

On3 NIL Database

On3's publicly available NIL valuations and deal disclosures are used to calibrate brand-side income estimates and NIL market score components by sport and follower tier.

ESPN Investigative Reporting

ESPN's 2024–2025 investigative reporting on school-specific revenue share commitments and position-based allocation priorities is integrated into tier-level range modeling.

Athletic Dept. Disclosures

Power 4 program athletic department financial disclosures, booster collective public statements, and reported school-specific NIL budgets are used to validate and bound all tier estimates.